FANDOM


  • Idroppedmypen
    Idroppedmypen closed this thread because:
    drama.
    17:44, May 24, 2020

    So,why do you think it is a really good idea to put slashes in descriptions of tracks which originally don't stop anywhere (and when they do, it's the style of the composition)?

    The slash should be put with descriptions of tracks which have several variations in a single audio,like Fredric Bayco's tracks or Punctuations by Ralph Dollimore.

      Loading editor
    • Also, I'll state why I'm for shorter and more understandable descriptions.

      What do you think people would like here?

      "Patrick messes up SpongeBob's alarm clock by stomping on it like a wild gorilla because of not understanding the word "carefully""?

      or

      "Patrick stomps on the alarm clock,destroying it"?

      The wikia, as JustYes stated earlier,is for editing.Yet you seem to think you are the boss of this wikia,so everything regarding music should be the same.

      And I am doing my best to be polite with you.I am not using all caps or lots of exclamation points in every description.I explain why I am editing your descriptions.When you disagree,you don't explain yourself other than "it's my style".This is a very petty reason.

        Loading editor
    • I do the slashes when a track stops and continues in an space of 3 seconds, if that stop is under 3 seconds I dont put any slash. And I always have done the same and nobody has told me anything about that.



      Appart from that, Im extremely tired of you removing away all my editions (Even when they're correct). I consider, along with many people, that adding long descriptions isnt a bad thing, and Im used to add them and I dont see any problem.

      I know the old Blogspot was used to shorten the descriptions, but thats because Allen wanted. And Im not Allen, so I dont wanna have to continue his way of descriptions. 

      Also, you're used to remove the adjectives I put to objects: Wishing well, rotten chum, magic trick...Theres nothing wrong to put adjectives.

      So, from now on, I would like you to edit only the grammar errors you see, please. Not anything else. Because you shorten the descriptions more than fixing grammar errors, so please, I would like you to do that only. Agree?

        Loading editor
    • No,I do not agree.I have stayed with Allen's blog for a very long time and I want to continue his legacy regarding the descriptions. 

      Adjectives should not be overused when a list of descriptions is below. Once or twice is enough.

        Loading editor
    • And it is strange to put slashes in tracks stopped by music editors.I think that slashes should be used in descriptions of tracks that originally have various versions in one audio recording.Therefore,there is a way to distinguish them.

        Loading editor
    • Its very funny you name me the boss of the wikia, coming from a stubborn like you it's hilarious.

      Also, I knew you wouldnt agree, in fact I dont understand why you had the iniciative to Talk with me when you dont wanna cooperate when I've tried now offering this propose to you.

      "I want to continue his legacy" Thats your reason to reedit all my editions? 

      If you want to continue his legacy Then tell him to give you the management of his old Blogspot.

        Loading editor
    • There is a word "context".If you knew it well,you'd probably understand what I am meaning to say.

      I am deleting the overused words and repeating of facts (whose object is it,where the characters speak,etc.) because it is not needed in a list of several descriptions.

      Out of context,in pages like "list of assosiated production music",it is more than welcome,because the action is taken OUT of context and people may not know what happened before or after.

      Here,it is all over the place and seems like hammering in other people's heads.

        Loading editor
    • You're acting like a complete boss. You're acting too wrong.

        Loading editor
    • Instead of insulting me,why don't you explain why you do not agree with my reasoning about context?

        Loading editor
    • Im not insulting you, in fact you're the one you're acting in an arrogant way.

      And what else have I to explain you? I already explained you above, you can read again.

      You're not explaining me Anything, all I know it's you will still annoying me because you wanna continue the legacy of your god Allen. 

      At least I offered to cooperate and you refused

        Loading editor
    • I'll leave an example here (not from your "descriptions",just to state the point).

      "SpongeBob is happy that he is learned a magic trick"

      "SpongeBob walks to Squidward to show him his magic trick"

      "Squidward doesn't want to see SpongeBob's magic trick"

      This is not good at all because every sentence ends with "magic trick".If taken out of context in track pages,it is passable because there are several other episodes around the track.

      In-context,this is not working. It better flows like this:

      "SpongeBob learns a magic trick"

      "He wants to show it to Squidward"

      "Squidward doesn't want to see the trick"

        Loading editor
    • Listen,before this gets any louder here,can you (or let me at least) bring this matter to the voting?You do not know how many others think about that,so if they are for your kind of descriptions,I'll leave you be.

        Loading editor
    • In a single sentence or text, I see bad.

      But since it's separated I see okay.

      Its that difficult to you to cooperate?

        Loading editor
    • Roman.sinitsyn.1 wrote:
      Listen,before this gets any louder here,can you (or let me at least) bring this matter to the voting?You do not know how many others think about that,so if they are for your kind of descriptions,I'll leave you be.

      Let's try. How can I see the votings?

        Loading editor
    • The descriptions are techincally not separated from each other because they form a list.

      They stay close to each other that way.And when the fact is stated several times in a single list,it can be annoying.

        Loading editor
    • Annoying to you.

      How can I see the voting?

        Loading editor
    •   Loading editor
    • Advice me when you got it., and explain me how it works

        Loading editor
    • Oh, you seem to be finally reverting the subject matter to the discussion page? That's great, I always wanted to do it. But since the other user can't use the button "space" or afraid of the apostrophe, it's better if I try to bring it.

        Loading editor
    • Better care of your things, this conversation hasnt anything to do with you, even if you think exactly as him

        Loading editor
    • RomNick1998 wrote:
      Oh, you seem to be finally reverting the subject matter to the discussion page? That's great, I always wanted to do it. But since the other user can't use the button "space" or afraid of the apostrophe, it's better if I try to bring it.

      You're an hypocrite. If you wanna wait untill someone says his opinion, then why you keep editing!?????

        Loading editor
    • Don't burst at me. I am busy forming the proposal.

        Loading editor
    • I repeat you again, I was talking with roman not with you.

      You're a shameless person

        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.