Just so you know, Figmeister told me in the most recent thread on his wall that one-time characters who had minor roles in their appearance or characters who debuted in a major role but were demoted to the background by their next appearance(s) do qualify for the Background characters category. Although, I agree that some of them may have been misplaced, but characters like fish with plate only appear for like a minute and don't affect the plot much.
I have seen your comment on my new blog post, and now, I am a little bit ashamed of my reviews. I will admit that I never wanted to insult the writers, but I could have been way more careful with my wording and because it did really sound like I wanted to insult the writers, I have no excuses. This isn't just an apology to you and the writers, this is an apology to everyone on the wiki. I won't write another blog pist about starting a new life since my old one still stands, but this is the only slipup I can allow to myself and if something similar happens in the future, I might do something new to prevent that. I guess I will continue reviewing episodes, but I will be careful to never mention the writers again unless it is not in an overyl negative way. Again, I apologise to everyone on the wiki - I hope people won't lose all respect for me after what I did.
Hi, I've been removing those book/game adaptation sections where the object plays the same role as in the original episode, because it serves no affect to the page as it is just useless repeat information. However, I've also been contemplating removing the other extremely short video game adaptation sections that Devon adds as an edit booster, particularly the sections about its appearance in a video game that only contain one sentence and go into very little detail about its affect on the game (e.g. "[Object] can be seen in [level].") Should those sections be removed as well?
Hello! I'm just here to remind you that we recently added a limit to how many deletion requests can be active at once (30). Any deletion requests created past that limit will be closed as invalid. Thanks! :)
First, this was not a poorly made page, honestly it's the best anyone could do for this. Two, your complaint, " Too minor for it's own role", what do you mean?! This wiki has a page ON THE DEEP FRYER, THE DEEP FRYER, how is anything to minor for this.
Your new article is poorly formatted and the writing is sub-standard.
The deep fryer is a recurring object and has served important roles in episodes like “Restraining SpongeBob” and “Squiditis.” The Triple Krabby Supreme is almost identical to a normal Krabby Patty and the plot would not change even if it was not given a unique name.
It is not allowed to recreate deleted articles without first creating a request for restoration and waiting for community consenseus.
Ok, I have to admit my formatting was kinda trash, and you really didn't have to remind me how my writing is on par of pre-schooler, but if my page will not be restored I kindly ask that someone with actual formatting skills (this was my first time making a page) and grammar and writing that doesn't resemble and frozen tumbleweed on a keyboard makes it instead. It deserves a page as much as anything else
I also want to say sorry for some things said in my first message, was kinda annoyed that my page was gonna be deleted like a aimbotting sniper getting kicked from a match, I don't think my page was up for even 5 minutes.
What do you mean? If you're trying to add an image, just put its filename in brackets, like [[File:SpongeBob.png]]. If you want to rename an image, only assistants can do that, but I could do it if you ask me.