Open Proposal

The following is an ongoing proposal. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules.

How proposals work:
Concern Stage
  • 1. Someone brings up a topic for a proposal.
  • 2. The community discusses that topic.
Voting Stage
  • 3. The proposal is brought to a vote, taking into account any changes discussed by the community.
  • 4. The community votes.

You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion.

{{Support}} • {{Neutral}} • {{Oppose}}
{{Like}} • {{Dislike}} • {{Change}} • {{Comment}} • {{Reply}} • {{Question}}
Note: Neutral votes do not count in determining the outcome percentage.


This is Quarterly user rights reviews (formerly known as "administrator reviews," but has since included non-administrators) which occurs every three months to determine whether or not promoted users should remain in their position. This may seem radical, but it is to ensure that only qualified members keep their rights.

Under the "Discussion" heading, we will discuss whether the user is fit for their position(s). When voting, you are encouraged to add a reason why you want someone demoted or why they should keep their rights. If a user has a majority of all participants and participating administrators (more than 50%) supporting the removal of their position (neutrals excluded), they may be subject to demotion. Bureaucrats will determine the final verdict, but the community discussion will be taken very largely into account. This is to avoid "friend" and "grudge" voting.

Please keep this discussion civil and don't be insulting. If you have criticism, make it constructive. If you are one of the users being reviewed, please do not force others to support you. Calmly responding to a user's concern is fine, but aggressive behavior will be taken into account by the bureaucrats when reviewing the results.

Voting key:

  • {{Keep}} - if you believe the user should keep their rights.
  • {{Neutral}} - if you are neutral to the user keeping their rights.
  • {{Suspend}} - if you believe the user should be suspended. Be sure to state your proposed length.
  • {{Remove}} - if you believe the user should lose their rights.

Obviously, you may not support yourself.

This discussion will end on Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 8:50 a.m., eastern time. --Spongebob456 talk 13:51, November 10, 2018 (UTC)








  • Comment Comment - If this is referencing to September and October of this past year, I had been extremely busy in real life during those two months. I will be picking up my activity now that October is over. кσσкιттү <мεssαgε ωα> (=^ ^=) 20:29, November 10, 2018 (UTC)



  • Comment Comment - Hello, thanks for the vote. I see your point, I can see how an admin always surrounded by criticism and drama can be potentially problematic. I do want to mention that I don't think much controversy has risen against me from my perspective. The only one I can remember was based off the closure of the SpongeBob Fanon Wiki which was long over. I've resolved tensions with them by a peace treaty and after they realized the full reason of the closure. I'm now all good with most SBFW users and haven't had a problem ever since. That's the main source of controversy during my time here and as admin. I also wanted to mention I think Rocky's concern might be from back then as the last time I interacted with him and all SBFW users at a time was back in early September. Overall, I don't believe any drama has been around me lately.
    Golfpecks2 (Contact • Contrib) 02:55, November 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Keep -  Figmeister (WCE)  17:01, November 10, 2018 (UTC) 
  • Support Extremely Strong Keep -  A Wikia Contributor ITALIAN's return (MCE) Bottle Burglars 180 ​​​​​
  • Oppose Remove - While this user has shown some growth I do feel like his immaturity off-wiki seems to hold up, and while many may state an argument on how "off-wiki matters do not matter", there have been many off-wiki matters dealt on this wiki, especially with Discord. I do feel like spending more time as an assistant will help fill in these gaps, as I feel like there could have been more to have been done as an assistant.  Rocky LobsterPatricklickgif (MCE)
  • Comment Comment - Thank you for your concern and I am sorry you feel this way. Were there any specific areas off-wiki were my maturity has been an issue? Also, I'm curious if you might be referring to my maturity quite some time ago or not. As if it might be my previous history in relation with you and some others, perhaps I might've improved from that in terms of being mature everywhere? If not, that's something I'll consider. Golfpecks2 (Contact • Contrib) 18:07, November 10, 2018 (UTC)






The Smarter, Wiser King Dedede



Discussion moderators


Support Support - Captain Cape (Cape's Talk) 11:29, November 13, 2018 (UTC)

Qwertyxp2000 the second



Chat moderators





Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.