ESB:User rights review/Jensonk/2

	User Rights Review Discussion Archive The following user rights review discussion has been resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page. Date Resolved: October 27, 2016 Result: Jensonk's suspension as an assistant ends.

Introduction

3 months ago, assistant Jensonk was suspended after events that occurred in the spring and fall of this year. Now that the suspension has ended, it's time to decide whether Jensonk remains assistant or is removed.

For your reference:

Please vote {{Keep}} if you think that Jensonk should be reinstated or {{Remove}} if you think Jensonk should not be reinstated as an assistant. This discussion will end on Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 11:30 p.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:26, October 21, 2016 (UTC)

Voting

Keep - his behavior has improved, and he is an excellent contributor. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 03:26, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - he has improved significantly. he has learned from this, and i believe he is ready. ѕqυι∂∂ℓєωαя∂ ^{❮мεssαgε ωαℓℓ ● cσηтяιвυтισηs ● ε∂ιтcσυηт❯} ^{03:27, October 21, 2016 (UTC)}
~~Keep - Per above. Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!} 03:28, October 21, 2016 (UTC)~~
Keep - One of the best editors, he deserves this. Per Squiddle and AMK! "For service and devotion" TheOneFootTallBrickWall (talk) 03:28, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - Per above. trevorontario w c clickme
Remove - --—

Cans48 _(Messages)

Neutral - Auron ⚡ Yeah, that's right baby! Welcome to my locker! ⚡
Keep -Behavoir improved plus Assistant is an editing position not a social one --Roller (talk) 03:34, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - He's probably one of the best contributors ever right now. He truly deserves his role as assistant again. Message Wall 03:35, October 21, 2016 (UTC)

Agreed, and there is still lots to cleanup in the wiki, such as removing the backlog of deletion requests of files and deleting unnecessary unused files, etc. Qwertyxp2000 the second (talk) 21:13, October 24, 2016 (UTC)

Keep - per Squiddle, AMK, Depth and Brick Jersey the DIEHL (SpongeFreddy777) wall • contribs03:44, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - Per above. Chuck123456 ^(M•C•E) 04:55, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Remove - I'll be honest that I'm not trying to say that he should be removed for good, but at the present time, I'm hesitant as to whether now is the right time. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 09:09, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Remove - AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)
Keep - He seems to be a good user, he would be good as an assistant again. -- User:TheThomas5252 (talk) 19:15, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - Although he did get blocked during his suspension, I think he is still worthy of it. This is not chat moderator or administrator. He is known to be an assistant, and he has done a good job at it. Again, he does have personal bias around him. This is coming from someone who voted to fully remove him last time 3 months ago. ⚡MightyMorphinJon⚡(message wall) 19:49, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - As long as he learns his lessons, he will do great with moderating the whole wiki and helping with tasks that would make it easier for him if he needs to clean up the wiki. Qwertyxp2000 the second (talk) 23:56, October 21, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral - Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!} 00:59, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - If users, such as Squiddleward, who for the most part, only make minor edits, can be administrator, then there is no reason that Jensonk should not be assistant. 120d Talk Contribs 15:25, October 23, 2016 (UTC)
- That is not a good comparison. Squiddleward does a lot more than minor edits. Also, being an administrator means a lot more than just editing, minor or not. ⚡MightyMorphinJon⚡(message wall) 20:47, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
  - You may notice that I wrote, "for the most part," meaning that I am aware that she does more than minor edits. I am also aware that being an admin means a lot more than just editing, but for this comparison, the other things she does are not important as Jensonk cannot do these things. 120d Talk Contribs 22:22, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed with MightyMorphinJon. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 21:09, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
Keep - Jensonk is a good user. I say keep. Tan Ham Man 19:17,10/24/2016
Keep - Now, I'm not an admin or anything, but Jensonk is a very good user and he waited out his 3 month suspension and learned his lesson. He has made a lot of great edits and hehas just done so much for this wikia. That's why I say keep. Phillydan25 ^{Wall Contribs 22:50, October 27, 2016 (UTC)}