|
Request for Chat Moderator Archive
The following chat moderator request has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
User requesting chat moderator: NatRox Date discussion closed: October 24, 2017 Result of discussion: Successful. |
|---|
NatRox (wall • contribs • 1,392)
| Requests by NatRox |
|---|
| see all requests |
a. Why do you believe you are qualified to be promoted to this position?
I believe I am qualified to be promoted because I am very active in chat, and have been for a while. Also occasionally the chat is invaded/socked, so they could use all the help they can get!
b. Have you had experience with this position before?
No, but I have seen circumstances in which the rights must be enforced to do things such as kick or block users. I have also read the chat policy, which says when and when not to use powers.
c. What are your best contributions to Encyclopedia SpongeBobia and why?
My best contributions are the pages; Goofy Goober Guitar, Patrick's wallet, and Aquaphone. I created these pages and added information. Another contribution is chatting. I chat more than I edit so I'll have done more things in chat than editing.
d. How do you plan to use your rights if your request is successful?
I plan to use my rights to enforce the rules of the chat-room. Kicking disruptive users, and using the ban feature only as a last resort after several kicks and warnings. I promise not to abuse my powers/abilities in any way, shape or form!
e. Have you been in a situation in which you needed the user rights for this position at that moment but were unable to act?
Yes. At one time when I was alone in chat-room some people came on and started spamming and trolling.
f. Is there anything else you want to add?
Yes please! I run my own discord server, which gives me some experience in the moderating job. Also, we are short of one moderator, since TheThomas5252 recently retired from the wiki.
Support
Support - BFrit10 (M•C•E) 
22:28, October 20, 2017 (UTC) - Support - DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E) 22:29, October 20, 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Bigfatonionslice Wall Contribs
- Support - Why not. LuigiTheMurderer (M•C•E) 00:22, October 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Very Weak Support - Your last request was in September and in fact you did two requests in September. I mean, you are active but I have seen times where you sometimes tell me you won't be on for two days or 4 days and all these breaks of activity isn't really good. But I admit, you manage an excellent discord server and you solve conflicts between other users which is why you have my support for this request. (Contact • Contrib) 00:33, October 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I think you're ready. (っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ Madiyunu - Message Wall ♥
- Weak Support - only going with weak support since this is your fourth chat moderator request after all. Although you have improved a lot since your other requests, and I think you're ready now. •кσσℓкιттү <мεssαgε ωαℓℓ> (=^ ◡ ^=)• 03:13, October 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Cheesie was here. 05:09, October 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Support - it's weak since we have enough mods to protect chat, but you clearly are a great user. Spongebobvstheloudhouse (M•C•E) 03:29, April 19, 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Active in chat and is a very nice user. Sponge o' Mystery (Depth Strider 10) 13:32, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Support - User:Expert at Terraria
- Support - Nookdawg (talk) 14:41, October 24, 2017 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral - Xenos001
Neutral - Oppose
Comments
I have a question for all those who supported his application. Why are you supporting? Do you agree with the answers he gave? I only came back here last month, but I've noticed a trend of people voting without giving any reason. I think I may need to propose a rule where votes will not count unless you give a valid reason. The only exceptions I can think of are; if someone nominates a user for a position and they write Per Nomination or per above, the second in which I believe should only be allowed once per application/nomination. Starkiller131 (talk) 15:38, October 21, 2017 (UTC)
- "where votes will not count unless you give a valid reason" What do you mean by "valid?" Do you mean something logical? Do you mean a good reason? Both of which are biased. Anyone could cross out votes they don't agree with by saying "invalid reason" if this was implemented. Besides, you don't have to give a reason for every single thing. DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E) 13:34, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
- People don't have to provide reasoning if they don't want to. NatRox (M•C•E)