Encyclopedia SpongeBobia
Encyclopedia SpongeBobia

Request for Bureaucrat Archive

The following bureaucratic request has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
User requesting bureaucrat: Stryker305
Date discussion closed: November 28, 2021
Result of discussion: Unsuccessful.

Stryker305 (wall contribs 11,594)

a. Why do you believe you are qualified to be promoted to this position?
I am an active user who has been working as an administrator of the Encyclopedia SpongeBobia every day since 2020. I delete files, monitor user edits, delete vandal pages, block users. I also keep an eye on Wiki when everyone has night time.

b. Have you had experience with this position before?
I am a bureaucrat on the Russian SpongeBob wiki.

c. What are your best contributions to Encyclopedia SpongeBobia and why?
My best contribution is all the edits I've made on this wiki. I improve galleries, delete unnecessary, redundant and copying files.

d. How do you plan to use your rights if your request is successful?
First, be an active bureaucrat. Figmeister is inactive due to studies, and Spongebob456 and AMK152 are semi-active. Secondly, accept user requests if they want to complain about the crew of the wiki. Thirdly, to participate in bureaucratic stuff (Emergency User Rights Review and etc), archive and grant administrator rights, assistant rights. Fourth, use your rights to delete vandal pages, edits, files.

e. Have you been in a situation in which you needed the user rights for this position at that moment but were unable to act?
There were no tough cases, but if two bureaucrats had not responded in time about the Emergency User Rights Review BookFandumb, then I do not know what would have happened. There were also cases (as recently in the request to the administrator) that only one bureaucrat voted.

f. Is there anything else you want to add?
I think not. Stryker305(Message Wall)(Contributions)(Editcount) November 21, 2021 10:13 UTC

Support

Neutral

  • Neutral - While I can agree that another bureaucrat would be nice to have, I am not entirely sure if you would be completely suited to this role. You mention how you would be able to grant user rights, but considering that you have done very little archiving of other discussions as of late, and you had to be prompted before you voted on SPONGEBOBSUPERFANINFINITY's recent administrator request, I am doubtful whether the days of the other administrators having to inform the bureaucrats that a user needs to be granted user rights would truly come to an end. The other reason why I am not supporting is because of a few issues that have arisen, largely due to your standard of English. While it is good for a non-native speaker, errors that you have made have caused problems from time to time, including once swearing at a user and smaller things such as blocking a user with the block reason "idiot" and talking to inexperienced users in a tone that can come across as fairly rude. I am very aware that you have unwaveringly contributed to this wiki in good faith, and that you have made many great edits during your time here as well. However, given that bureaucrats are seen as the pinnacle of a wiki's userbase by inexperienced users and outsiders alike, the issues that I have brought up when put together mean that I do not feel as though I can support this at the moment, although with a few small changes I would be willing to support you getting these rights at a later date. The gamer 987654321 (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Neutral leaning toward Support - I'm close to supporting this, but Gamer does bring up good points. I definitely think you'd be a good fit with time though.  BSpongeSM02 (WCELA)   16:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 
  • Neutral leaning toward Support -  Robski10 (MCE)  
  • Neutral leaning toward Support - After giving it some thought and reading the points brought up by Gamer, I have decided to change my vote. You definitely will be a great candidate with a little more time. ··𝒮𝒫𝒪𝒩𝒢𝐸𝐵𝒪𝐵𝒮𝒰𝒫𝐸𝑅𝐹𝒜𝒩𝐼𝒩𝐹𝐼𝒩𝐼𝒯𝒴 ··
  • Neutral leaning toward Support -  SpongeTron D (WCE)  I love SB-129 
  • Neutral - I'm not sure, I could change my vote in the future Spongeboy0009(M|B|C)21 Nov 2021 18:10 UTC
  • Neutral - Per Gamer and BSponge.  Anthony2306 (WCLE)  19:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 
  • Neutral - Per above. 𝔎𝔬𝔬𝔩𝔨𝔦𝔱𝔱𝔶 M·C·E
  • Neutral - Per above. Actiondude2 (MCUE) 
  • Neutral leaning toward Support -  Kylecocjin (WCE) 
  • Neutral leaning toward Oppose - Per The gamer. Sorry, but giving someone a block reason of "idiot" isn't a very good example to set for one that is a staff member, hence why I'm leaning towards oppose for now. I may support down the road, though. -Arthur Read fan (talk) 05:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Oppose - "There were no tough cases." Then you don't need the rights.  FireMatch (WCE)  15:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 
  • Oppose - WoofWoofGam3r
  • Oppose -  DanzxvFan8275 (MCUE)  18:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 
  • Oppose - I am not so sure I just don't think your'e ready  Slippery  CHOIR BOYS YOU SUCK!!!!!! 

Comments