ESB:Requests for bureaucrat/Nicko756

	Request for Bureaucrat Archive The following bureaucratic request has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page. User requesting bureaucrat: Nicko756 Date discussion closed: August 9, 2015 Result of discussion: Unsuccessful; lack of bureaucratic support; only 40% administrative support.

Nicko756 (wall • contribs • 39,140)

Hello everyone! I've been an active admin here for over a year, and I believe I'm ready to become a bureaucrat. I would like to help AMK with discussions, help out with admin requests, and be able to assist the community even more! I also would like to become one because we only have two active bureaucrats.

Should I become a bureaucrat? The choice is yours!  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  17:58, August 2, 2015 (UTC) 

Support

• Support - Dragonballgtgoku ^{«Talk Page/Contribs»} 18:59, August 2, 2015 (UTC)
• SUPPORT FOR MY LIFE - Nicko, you are one of the best users around. You have helped the community and myself in many ways and I am all for this request. 100% support. You deserve this. Jersey Chat with me! 19:46, August 2, 2015 (UTC)
• Support - Nicko is very very smart, and very friendly. I think he'd be an excellent bureaucrat! Mark is right, you definitely deserve a 100% support. - Jacktheguy5
• Support - A very sensible, trustworthy user. I feel he has a lot of respect from the community and is easily one of the most active users on the wiki. My only reservation for him as bureaucrat is us having 4 already. Obviously, we don't want to be bloated with bureaucrats, but I think he'd fit well within within the team. I just ask that he carries on with what he's doing, and is sure to consult with the community before making any drastic changes. Great work, Nicko! --Spongebob456 ^talk 10:51, August 3, 2015 (UTC)
• Support - Tominator777 ^{(Wall•Contribs) 20:46, August 4, 2015 (UTC)}
• Support - Seems like a good user ItsShehahnbro ^talk
• Support -Dejavukitkat13
• Support - Very good admin! Would make a good b-crat!

Mismag	Talk	Contribs	Edits

• Support - He has managed to make almost the same amount of positive contributions in a one year as me in 4-5 years.  AW10  Talk  Contribs  E-Mail  16:46,8/5/2015 
• Support - -PatrickFanatic
• Support - --PatrickFan (Talk) 18:53, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
• Support ---ＳｏｎｉｃＴｈｅＥｐｉｃ (talk) 13:55, August 6, 2015 (UTC)
• Support - Koolkitty
• Support - -DeviantPooper

Neutral

• Neutral - PrezDubs messagewall 19:16, August 2, 2015 (UTC)
• Neutral - Nicko you are a great guy, your edits speak for itself, but I need to think about having 5 crats, when I think about it I will obviously support. --Patrick Star (Oh My....) 22:36, August 2, 2015 (UTC)
• Neutral - I am honestly not certain at the moment. You have brought some good ideas and are very active in discussions, but there have been past tensions that can be a concern. While time heals all wounds, I think this may be too premature. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 16:20, August 3, 2015 (UTC)
• Neutral - I'm not sure. I think you're fine as an admin but i'm not sure if you're active enough for crat. Auron May the odds be ever in your favor!   21:28,8/4/2015 

• Please take a look at my contribs page. I'm pretty sure I'm active enough.  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  21:32, August 4, 2015 (UTC) 

• Neutral - I really don't know you well enough to decide just yet. So I will go neutral. :)  Sawpog46  Talk  Contribs  E-Mail   
• Neutral - ZeoSpark  Talk  Contribs  Edits  22:19,8/4/2015 
• Neutral -  —Lewis2567 ^{(Wall•Contribs)} 23:06, August 7, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose

• Extremely Strong Oppose - I believe that you don't deserve this position because of your behavior. While, you are a good editor, when it comes to things like grammar you have NO leeway. You will even edit just to change those types of things. Our past has not at all been perfect. You ruined a perfectly good title system only because you can't admit that I am right and you are wrong. You have made titles of pages the way you want them. You are unbelievably selfish. The fact that you got admin was the very reason I left a year ago. You cannot allow any compromise whatsoever. I don't care how much you've grown since we met. You will not deserve this until you can admit that I have been right about grammar or set least the title system. People have forgotten the bad side of you, but I have not and never will. If you deserve to be a bureaucrat, then I most definitely deserve it. I do hope this changes people's votes to oppose. Although, it is quite long so I doubt anyone will read it.  120d  Talk  Contribs  16:38, August 3, 2015 (UTC) 
• Oppose - Sorry mate, per 120d. --Patrick Star (Oh My....) 10:59, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

• Comment - I just want to point out I am eligible for bureaucrat according to Section C8 of the administrative policy: "Any administrator requesting promotion to bureaucrat that does not meet the criteria outlined in clause 1, above, may be waived if the request is supported by all other active bureaucrats and the requestor has been an active administrator for at least one (1) year."  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  17:58, August 2, 2015 (UTC)