|
Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: September 5, 2017
|
|---|
Instructions
This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Skype policy (revision 6)."
With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Have a happy voting!
Proposal
Sawpog46's proposal is as follows:
I think that the 50 Edit Rule for being part of the Skype chat is ridiculous. Being active in chat is not an option to people who have trouble with certain users or just don't like talking in the chat. Austin brought up a good idea - Lets have it so that users have to be active for a month before they can be in there. That way, dedicated users don't have to push themselves just so they can be in that chat.
- C. Skype chat rooms (revised August 10, 2017)
- 1. The policies in this section apply to the ESB chat rooms on Skype.
- 2. Adding users
- a. Any user is allowed to add other users to the chat. However, users can only be added if they are:
- i. A current member of ESB. Users who have retired from ESB
,or left FANDOM altogether, or are inactive (with the exception of chat moderators, discussion moderators, administrators, and bureaucrats)are not allowed into the Skype chat. - ii. At least one (1) month must have passed since the user's first edit.
- iii. The user is not blocked from ESB or FANDOM (meaning they are not globally blocked from the network). Users who are unable to edit on the wiki or even enter the chat room are not to be allowed into the Skype chat rooms.
- i. A current member of ESB. Users who have retired from ESB
Since the policy changes weren't included in the proposal, I added them above. Voting ends on September 5, 2017 at 9:11 p.m., eastern time. Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign!
01:11, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
Voting
Oppose - Inactive users shouldn't be in the ESB Skype chatroom. Also, I don't believe having a one-month requirement is necessary. Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 01:13, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - Inactive users shouldn't be in the ESB Skype chatroom. Also, I don't believe having a one-month requirement is necessary. - Oppose - Per Nicko. TheOneFootTallBrickWall (sign!) 01:24, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
- Support - A user could be active on Skype, but not on the wiki. They would be removed because of that, which does not really make sense. If users have time for Skype but not the wiki, they shouldn't be removed because of that. DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E) 01:31, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
Support - A user could be active on Skype, but not on the wiki. They would be removed because of that, which does not really make sense. If users have time for Skype but not the wiki, they shouldn't be removed because of that. 
- Support - Per Philly. ⚡MightyMorphinJon⚡(message wall) 05:52, August 30, 2017 (UTC)
- Support - per daniel. -
Statuens in patre dextra.(Cans48)01:24, August 31, 2017 (UTC)
- Support - AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)
- Support - Chuck123456 (M•C•E) 18:58, August 31, 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I will note that "ESB Skype" is an ESB chat, not a general SpongeBob SquarePants chat. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 19:06, August 31, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I will note that "ESB Skype" is an ESB chat, not a general SpongeBob SquarePants chat. — - Support - Bigfatonionslice Wall Contribs
- Oppose - as amk said, esb skype is specifically a chat about this wiki, and if a user is rarely involved in wiki matters, as one would have to be to be classified as inactive, why should they be included in a chat with that as the main focus? ѕqυι∂∂ℓєωαя∂ ❮мεssαgε ωαℓℓ ● cσηтяιвυтισηs ● ε∂ιтcσυηт❯ 00:57, September 1, 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Nicko and AMK. It's an ESB skype chat not a general SpongeBob SquarePants one. --Spongebob456 talk 07:07, September 2, 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - If a user isn't active on the wiki, why should they be on our skype? SpongeBot678 (M•C•E) 07:12, September 2, 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per above. I wouldn't say allowing people whose last edit was last year in the skype has much of a point. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 18:26, September 4, 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - ThomasGaming64 Wall Contribs
