Open Proposal

The following is an ongoing proposal. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules.

How proposals work:
Concern Stage
  • 1. Someone brings up a topic for a proposal.
  • 2. The community discusses that topic.
Voting Stage
  • 3. The proposal is brought to a vote, taking into account any changes discussed by the community.
  • 4. The community votes.

You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion.

{{Support}} • {{Neutral}} • {{Oppose}}
{{Like}} • {{Dislike}} • {{Change}} • {{Comment}} • {{Reply}} • {{Question}}
Note: Neutral votes do not count in determining the outcome percentage.


This is a page is a voting stage of this discussion: "Rollback tags."

After all concerns from concern stage of this discussion has been resolved and taken into account, proposal located in "Proposal" section above has been created and put to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.

Have a happy voting!


SB29 is proposing the following:

Hello, I'm SB29, a new editor here and I've noticed that rollbacks don't have the red tags next to their names. I think they should have them per my reasons below:

  • Rollbacks can revert vandalism easily
  • Admins aren't online 24/7 so rollbacks are like the next person to contact when a vandal is vandalizing a page.

Rollbacks are a member of staff and are a part of the administration, therefore, they also deserve the tag as they are a member of staff, despite them only having one ability. Rollbacks can be very useful and helpful and tend to be more active than the administrators. So, to summarize this up, I propose to have rollbacks with red tags. SB29 (talk) 00:41, December 11, 2017 (UTC)

Voting concludes on December 26, 2017, at 8:05 p.m. EDT.  SB29   Wall  Contribs  E-Mail  Predated   01:09, December 20, 2017 (UTC)


Choose your input: SupportNeutralOpposeComment

  • Support Support - I think because you will make great help to the wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkPopplio94 (wallcontribs). Remember to sign your posts with ~~~~
  • Support Support - Why did they not have them in the first place? It would be great for identifying. Views
  • Support Support -  Figmeister (WCE)  01:52, December 20, 2017 (UTC) 
  • Comment Comment - But.. Though rollbacks have such a small right to revert edits and anyone can undo edits but.. Reverting the edit will mean that the revert will not be on the wiki activity page meaning the vandal won't know if their edit was reverted or not. If you undo an edit, it clearly shows in the wiki activity and the vandal can easily see that and vandalize the same article again. That's a bonus which is why I like this idea. Therefore, if an admin isn't on to stop the vandalism, the rollback should be the next person to contact to revert the edits with just one click. Golfpecks2 (Contact • Contrib) 03:16, December 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment - If an admin isn't available, a message should be left on their message wall. Rollbacks should not be contacted as they do not have the ability to warn or block vandals.  Nicko756 (MCE) Sign!Dp  06:20, December 21, 2017 (UTC) 
  • Support Support -  RedBomb1 (MCE) M001 - The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie (0161) 21:25, December 21, 2017 (UTC) 
  • Neutral Neutral - Seems like a good idea. Only voting neutral since we already had a previous proposal on that.  Tyler730 (MCE)  7:20 PM, December 21, 2017 (UTC) 
  • Support Support -  Jodan111 (TBCE) Squid 01:47, December 22, 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose - Per Nicko.  Chuck123456 (MCE) Potatoes that look like squidward 14:40, December 23, 2017 (UTC) 
  • Support Support - Why is this not a thing already? It seems like something anyone would've done already. --Data 08:29, December 24, 2017 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.