mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*{{Oppose}} That thing in "[[Can You Spare a Dime?]]" is an oversight, and absolutely qualifies as an error; no reasoning is given and it is just blatantly ignored. Not being picky on cartoon logic (for example, "how can fire be underwater?") is already in the manual of style. --[[User:The gamer 987654321|The gamer 987654321]] ([[User talk:The_gamer_987654321|talk]]) 09:37, June 26, 2020 (UTC) |
*{{Oppose}} That thing in "[[Can You Spare a Dime?]]" is an oversight, and absolutely qualifies as an error; no reasoning is given and it is just blatantly ignored. Not being picky on cartoon logic (for example, "how can fire be underwater?") is already in the manual of style. --[[User:The gamer 987654321|The gamer 987654321]] ([[User talk:The_gamer_987654321|talk]]) 09:37, June 26, 2020 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | *{{Support}} {{DF8Sig|11:24, June 26, 2020 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 11:24, 26 June 2020
Open Proposal
The following is an ongoing proposal. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules. How proposals work
You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion. Neutral votes do not count in determining the outcome percentage. |
Instructions
This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Remove errors that are one-off gags or purposely defy logic."
With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Have a happy voting!
Proposal
I thought removing entries enlisted under the "Errors" section that are just one-off gags done for a short time or purposely defy the logic of reality were commonplace to remove, but apparently that's not true, which is why I'm making a proposal.
Anyway, one-off gags or stuff that purposely contradicts the outcome of what would happen if the event occurred in real life are completely intentional and do not constitute as errors in any way because it's a cartoon and can defy logic as much as it likes. Stuff like Squidward being shown with his paintings stuck in his stomach only to disappear seconds later in "Can You Spare a Dime?," Squidward's nose being ripped off in "Clams" only to return in the next scene, and Patrick losing an arm only to grow it back later are nothing more than gags done purposely for the sake of contradicting continuity and are intentionally defiant to real-life logic, and as such they don't qualify. EmilyHReturns (M•C•B•E) 11:05, June 18, 2020 (UTC)
Voting will conclude on July 3, 2020, at 12:19 AM EDT. Figmeister (W•C•E) 04:21, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
Voting
- Support - Removing this type of trivia/errors should be common sense. Figmeister (W•C•E) 04:23, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
- Support - SpongeTron D (W•C•E) I love SB-129
- Strong Support - Kylecocjin (W•C•E)
- yes - idk why this wasn't a thing before. Idroppedmypen ★ 04:28, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
- Very Strong Support - I'm surprised this even needed a proposal. Cartoons don't follow reality logic; the only things that constitute as errors are inconsistency in dialogue and animation. EmilyHReturns (M•C•B•E) 04:28, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - That thing in "Can You Spare a Dime?" is an oversight, and absolutely qualifies as an error; no reasoning is given and it is just blatantly ignored. Not being picky on cartoon logic (for example, "how can fire be underwater?") is already in the manual of style. --The gamer 987654321 (talk) 09:37, June 26, 2020 (UTC)
- Support - DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E) 11:24, June 26, 2020 (UTC)