|
Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: June 7, 2022
|
|---|
Instructions
This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Limiting the number of "Elimination Games" in discussions."
With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Have a happy voting!
Proposal
Juan90980 is proposing the following:
Several users have complained about this (in the replies to the "Luigi is our god" retirement there are many people upset by these games), and even a user retired because of this, and it is understandable, it can be annoying that only in the discussions there are "elimination games" and nothing else, but eliminate them completely is not an option, because it would lower the activity in the discussions, so the best solution is to limit them, and I propose the following for the ESB "games policy".
- There cannot be more than five "Elimination Games" at the same time.
- If any user makes an "Elimination Game" when there are already five, that "Elimination Game" will be deleted, and an alert will be given to the user, and if this is done another 2 times (for a total of 3), the user will be blocked for 3 days.
- There can only be one (1) "Elimination Game" per user.
if this happens, the discussions would be more controlled in the "Elimination Games" topic and well, that's all I wanted to propose. Juan90980 (W•C•E•A) My Leg! is a bad episode
The voting stage will conclude no later than June 7, 2022 at 6:42 PM EST (June 7, 2022 at 22:42 UTC). Anthony2306 (W•C•L•E) 22:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Voting
Weak Oppose - Anthony2306 (W•C•L•E) 23:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Neutral - You seem to have a good idea about limiting the number of elimination games, but per FireMatch. Kylecocjin (W•C•E)
Neutral - You seem to have a good idea about limiting the number of elimination games, but per FireMatch. 
- Oppose - SpongeTron D (W•C•E) I love SB-129
- Extremely Strong Oppose - This will severely affect activity in Discussions and as a discussion moderator myself I would prefer a higher moderation of these posts by mods and admins than completely limiting them altogether. ItzSpongeBob 1999 M·B·C·E 14:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support - Your reasons seems to be okay. Weak Oppose - Per everyone else. Ddg1208gaming M·C·E 17:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Weak Support - Your reasons seems to be okay.- Neutral - Cokic na Xic
- Extremely Strong Oppose - Per FireMatch and ItzSpongeBob 1999. -Arthur Read fan (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral leaning toward Support - Both sides make good points. SpongyFanatic2021 M·C·E 13:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Neutral leaning toward Support - Both sides make good points. 
- Oppose - UsedPieman187 M·C·E 15:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - Jensonk
- Neutral leaning toward Oppose - Per Itzy. PinkPugPrincess (W♥C♥L♥E♥A) 10:01, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The Most Extremist Strong Oppose Ever - There's a lot of big questions that makes us feel small: Why are we here, what's the point of it all? Tell us to look in our books, but to find the real answer? It's all about the hooks. Don't think about the lyrics. Don't think about the beat. Just shake that booty, and get on your feet. Just throw your hands up and sway to this song, 'cause when you're dancin' you can't be wrong. ASpongeBobFan (W•C•E•A)
Neutral leaning toward Oppose - Per Itzy. 
