|
Proposal Archive
The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
Date Resolved: September 8, 2016
|
|---|
Instructions
This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Inactive user definition."
With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Have a happy voting!
Proposal
The following change to the definition of an inactive user was proposed by AustinD-3:
All additions are in bold and things removed are struck out.
- 3. Inactive User - any user in which both of the following applies:
- a. Any user that has made
less than (99)no contributions within one (1) month preceding the present date. - b. Any user that is rarely involved in ESB official discussions as well as any of the ESB official chatrooms, including ESB Chat and Skype (SpongeBobia Chatroom, ESB Administrators, ESB Bureaucrats, etc.). By rarely involved, meaning participating in conversations every once in a while.
- a. Any user that has made
This voting stage will end on Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 1:10 p.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 17:01, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
Voting
Oppose - this would open up the loophole in which inactive users could just edit to keep their status. Having the original wording opens up interpretation to the community, especially when semi-active users make a couple edits per month but are not involved. This would make things more difficult. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 17:03, August 29, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - ❧Cans48❦(talk)
- Oppose - Per AMK. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 00:04, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - FlyingDutchmen (M•C•E) 09:24 August 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Luis~SBCA M C #Laban Pilipinas! 10:12,08/30/2016
- Oppose - Chuck123456 (M•C•E) 14:13, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sponge o' Mystery (Depth Strider 10)
- Oppose - Per AMK.
The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 15:14, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Jordan2001 (M•C•E) 00:37, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I would say that it needs to be fewer than 50 edits to be called an 'inactive user'.- The Gamer 987654321
Comment - I would say that it needs to be fewer than 50 edits to be called an 'inactive user'.- The Gamer 987654321- Oppose - Per above. "For service and devotion" TheOneFootTallBrickWall (talk) 08:11, September 5, 2016 (UTC)
