ESB:Proposals/Demotion policy (revision 7)/voting

	Proposal Archive The following proposal has been discussed and is now marked as resolved. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page. Date Resolved: August 14, 2017 Result: Passed.

Instructions

This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Demotion policy (revision 7)."

With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.

Have a happy voting!

Proposal

I am proposing the following changes to the demotion policy:

• B. Retirement and resignation (revised September 11, 2016)

• 1. Any user who wishes to no longer hold a promoted position and thus retires or resigns can demote themselves. They may notify a bureaucrat to have their powers removed as well.
• 2. If a bureaucrat resigns or retires and fails to remove their powers, a discussion is required for FANDOM Staff will be contacted to demote them.

• C. Termination (revised July 31, 2017)

• 1. A user may be terminated for various reasons, including, but not limited to: inactivity, violating the rules, abuse of rights, and/or disruptive behavior.
• 2. The process for termination is different depending on the user's position in the wiki.

• a. Termination of a rollback may must be done so at the discretion of the majority of the administration by a majority vote of all administrators.
• b. Termination of a chat moderator, discussion moderator, or an assistant must be done so by a majority vote of all bureaucrats. The rest of the administration (sysop only) may overrule the decision by a majority vote.
• c. Termination of an administrator or bureaucrat must be done so through a User Rights Review discussion.
• d. For rollback, chat moderators, discussion moderators, and assistants, a User Rights Review discussion can be created, but is optional.

Voting will end on Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 11:48 p.m., eastern time.  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  03:48, August 7, 2017 (UTC) 

Voting

Choose your input: Support • Neutral • Oppose • Comment

• Support - As proposer.  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  03:54, August 7, 2017 (UTC) 

• Oppose - Chat moderator should rather be held in a user rights review, since it's a larger right compared to rollback. There should be a community vote for demoting a chat moderator if there is for promoting a chat moderator. ⚡MightyMorphinJon⚡(message wall) 04:03, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

• Support - It's not like it's happened before. I can't see it happening to any current Chat mod either.-TheOneFootTallBrickWall sign my guestbook! 04:16, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

• Weak Support - Jon has a point, but other then that, I support.  DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E)  11:53, August 7, 2017 (UTC) 

• Support - Bigfatonionslice    ^{Wall Contribs}

• Neutral - I agree with the point of the proposal but I can also see Jon's view on a more democratic process for Chat Mods. Unsure at the minute - may change my vote later but this is how I'm feeling at the moment. --Spongebob456 ^talk 12:26, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose - Per Jon. AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)

• Neutral - ➞Sσпιҫᵀʰᵉξριҫッ 01:52, August 8, 2017 (UTC)

• Neutral - per SB456. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 04:37, August 8, 2017 (UTC)

• Comment - I made some changes to the proposal. Now, I'm essentially just rewording the current policy.  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  05:50, August 10, 2017 (UTC) 

• Support - Happy with the amendments. --Spongebob456 ^talk 18:32, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

• Extremely Strong Support - I should have written that in my revision instead of leaving it at may. The Ninja5 Empire (Message Wall) 04:52, August 13, 2017 (UTC)

• Neutral leaning toward Oppose - DIZCUAZOIN (talk) 04:28, August 14, 2017 (UTC)