Open Proposal
The following is an ongoing proposal. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules. How proposals work
You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion. Neutral votes do not count in determining the outcome percentage. |
Introduction
After a discussion in chat, we have come up with a way to best deal with chat moderator appointments. Just to make things official, here is the proposal. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 21:45, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
Proposal
The proposal is as follows:
- A. Chat moderator appointments
- 1. Anyone who wishes to request an appointment as a chat moderator must make it known to the host of the chat meetings.
- 2. All chat moderator appointments will be discussed in the chat meetings before appointment.
- 3. Only bureaucrats can appoint chat moderators, if their request is accepted at the meeting.
- 4. Anyone who is appointed to chat moderator outside of these guidelines will be immediately demoted until the appointment can be discussed.
This discussion will end on Sunday, August 10, 2014 at 6 p.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 21:45, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
Discussion
Support
- Template:Extremely Strong Support Yes!! It's about time we do this. Joey (talk) 22:00, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Support - ^ 03:29,8/4/2014 Muchacha (W•C)OVERTIME?!!!
- Weak Support - Per below, I'm not sure if this'll make meetings too long. Perhaps it would be more productive if we just allowed bureaucrats to promote a mod without discussion. If an Admin has a suggestion for someone who should be a Mod, just message a bureaucrat who can make a decision. Otherwise, all is good. --Spongebob456 talk 08:44, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Extremely Strong Support --Jezz55 (talk) 21:52, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose - I have changed my mind. The meetings tend to get very long. Having chat mod appointments during meetings would just make the meetings longer. Also, I don't like the fact that only bureaucrats can grant chat mod rights.
Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 07:00, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Chat moderator discussions at meetings would only take about 5 minutes. Most weeks there may not even be such a discussion. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 13:41, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, Nicko, I don't like how only bureaucrats can do it either. That's why I didn't give a stronger support. We could still have discussions about it, but what's the point in the Apply Chat Mod Status for we administrators if this proposal passes? 13:47,8/5/2014 Muchacha (W•C)OVERTIME?!!!
Neutral
Neutral - Nicko756 (M•C•E) Sign! 21:47, August 3, 2014 (UTC)- Template:Neutral towards OpposeThe last point sounds like it will affect existing chat mods. Until i know for sure that current chat mods (including myself) will be unaffected by this i'm going to go towards oppose.
Auron May the odds be ever in your favor! 02:38,8/23/2015
Comments