After all concerns from concern stage of this discussion has been resolved and taken into account, proposal located in "Proposal" section above has been created and put to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.
Have a happy voting!
There have been a few discussions to include rollbacks in our scheduled quarterly user rights reviews. This proposal would add them to that.
Article X: Demotions
D. Quarterly User Rights Reviews
1. Every three (3) months, all bureaucrats, administrators, assistants, discussion moderators, and chat moderators, and rollbacks will be put through a review process so the community can assess their status to ensure the most qualified people remain in their positions.
2. AdministrationThese user rights reviews will occur four times per year, beginning on the following dates: February 10, May 10, August 10, and November 10.
Voting ends Friday, February 16, 2018 at 8:20 p.m., eastern time. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 13:19, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
Support - originally I would have opposed, but since rollbacks can be promoted at the discretion of any administrator, it gives them accountability if they are not exempt from these reviews. Even though rollback is appointed and a very small role, a scheduled user rights review would justify whether or not the person should have been appointed. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 13:21, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
Oppose - The only power rollbacks do is revert edits in a single click, I see no reason as to why a rollback would need discussion of whether they keep their powers or not. The only way I could think of a reason is a behavior problem. Xenos001 (talk)