ESB:Block reviews/Spongebobfan1553

Block review The following is an ongoing block review. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules. You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion. {{Support}} - use this if you support the removal of the block. {{Neutral}} - use this if you are neutral to the removal of the block. {{Oppose}} - use this if you oppose the removal of the block. Note that neutrals do not affect the final percentage.

Spongebobfan1553 (wall • contribs • 97)

Information	Details
Blocking administrator	Chuck123456
Length of block	Infinite
Reason for block	Sockpuppet
User starting review	Golfpecks
Reason for review	This account is not a sockpuppet. This is his first, old account.

Support

• Support - Where is the proof? AFallenPower ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 14:55, August 18, 2017 (UTC)
• Strong Support - As Reviewer. (Contact • Contrib) {{{1}}}
• Extremely Strong Support - Per Fallen. SamLikesToDiscussMe (talk) 17:38, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

• Neutral - I will oppose once proof is given. AFallenPower ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 20:21, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

• • Comment -

    

    I know screenshots don't count as proof but that is the only proof I can give.  SpongeBot678 ^(M•C•E)  20:25, August 20, 2017 (UTC) 

• Neutral - I don't think I am informed enough to make a proper vote, but if, as the defender says, it is just the user's old account, then the user shouldn't be blocked. - AGenericContributor 11:17, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - The problem is the user vandalised pages with their "old account."  SpongeBot678 ^(M•C•E)  11:24, August 24, 2017 (UTC) 

Oppose

• Oppose - I have proof that this user is a sock of DrakeS.1500, if you would like some proof then ask me on my wall and I will give you the proof.  SpongeBot678 ^(M•C•E)  15:30, August 20, 2017 (UTC) 
• Oppose - ThomasGaming64   ^{Wall Contribs}
• Oppose - Per SpongeBot.  Chuck123456 ^(M•C•E)  15:50, August 20, 2017 (UTC) 
• Oppose - Per SpongeBot.  Nicko756 ^{(M•C•E) Sign!}  17:07, August 20, 2017 (UTC) 
• Extremely Strong Oppose - AustinD-3 (Message Me Here!)
• Oppose - Per SpongeBot Bigfatonionslice    ^{Wall Contribs}
• Oppose -  DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E)  20:14, August 20, 2017 (UTC) 
• Oppose -  Nickmick ^{(M•C•E•B)}   
• Oppose - Proof have been given. AFallenPower ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 23:01, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Per SpongeBot and the staff member. But if the staff confirms they're linked, why haven't they globally blocked the accounts? Cheesie 00:34, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - They only globally block when they have violated the tou which these accounts have yet to do.  SpongeBot678 ^(M•C•E)  06:25, August 21, 2017 (UTC) 
  • Comment - Oh ok. --Cheesie 23:21, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - (Contact • Contrib) 13:20 August 21, 2017
• STRONG STRONG OPPOSE - SOCKPUPPET OF ANOTHER USERNAME. SamLikesToDiscussMe (talk) 22:45, August 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Very Weak Oppose - While I do now think that the block should remain, there could be strong repercussions with more sockpuppets. - AGenericContributor