The following block review has been closed. The page has been protected and now serves as an archive. Do not edit this page.
User requesting review: Jensonk Date discussion closed: November 21, 2017 Result of discussion: Not passed.
Constant disruption over a period of three years as seen with his colourful block history. Been gblocked recently too. Ignores warnings.
User starting review
Expert at Terraria
Reason for review
I feel like blocking Jensonk for infinite is a bit ridiculous because he doesn’t troll, vandalize pages, make socks to evade blocks, minimod, make irrelevant comments, cuss, etc. He might be rude but he doesn’t deserve an infinite block. Also, there are much worse users than Jensonk. Also, the “borrowing” comment, he was just making a reference to an episode. Also the “heart attack” comment, I know that’s unacceptable, but he doesn’t deserve an infinite block because of it. Also, there are also a few users (including me), don’t want Jensonk to be blocked infinitely. Also, everybody makes mistakes. Also, he makes great edits on pages. Also, if you want more info on why I don’t want him blocked infinitely, check SpongeBot’s thread “I will make a blog soon” and check my reply #37. Overall, I feel that an infinite block is a bit unfair.
Super Strong Support - As nominater and my reply #37 on SpongeBot’s thread “I will make a blog soon.” Expert at Terraria
Neutral leaning towards Oppose - I saw this one coming. He is a great editor (which seems to be why he managed to stay here for 3 years despite the trolling and rudeness) but his behaviour hasn't improved and he should know better. I agree with the people who say an infinite block is excessive but I don't think someone's idea of another 3-month block is good enough. The only reason why I voted in the Neutral is because of his edits and because the infinite block looks extreme but I wouldn't be surprised if this block review didn't pass. --Cheesie was here. 19:06, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Neutral - He has been given numerous warnings and short blocks. A longer one is in order, so I would say wait a year, and we can have this conversation again. — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 19:07, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Neutral - I really care for Jensonk here, he used to be a good user and now his hated by almost everyone in the community. I really hope this doesn’t affect him in real life. But after looking at some other user’s points, even I can’t support this. LuigiTheMurderer(M•C•E) 01:33, November 6, 2017 (UTC)
Neutral - He was a great editor and has been here for awhile. Maybe infinite was a little too long... •кσσℓкιттү<мεssαgεωαℓℓ>(=^◡^=)•
Comment - You're kidding, right? You mean that despite all the chances he was given which he only continued his behavior after, he deserves to be let off the hook eventually just because he edits perfectly? RedBomb1(M•C•E) 19:20, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
Extremely Strong Oppose - You can't be serious. He got enough chances. Contributions don't excuse his terrible behavior, we've let it slide for too long. Jensonk was told that he might get blocked indefinitely and he didn't listen anyway, so I don't think he will ever change. Chuck123456(M•C•E) 19:10, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - Since I am fairly new here, I wasn't aware of this user's behavior until recently. Up until that point I just thought they were an average contributor who liked to help the community. However, after looking through his block log and seeing some of the numerous comments he's made recently, I don't think he should be unblocked. Squiddleward pretty much summed up his rude ways in a reply she made to thread by SpongeBot678. No matter what kind of bad things a person has done, it doesn't matter whom an offensive comment is directed to. Doing things to hinder one's disability and saying that others should get a heart attack and commit suicide is unacceptable by all means necessary. Also even if it was just an episode reference, I still don't think that was the appropriate place to make such a joke; Tumblrdesxx was talking about very serious real-world issues that almost got her in legal trouble.
Regardless of how true the points made in the first paragraph may be, I honestly do not think this user deserves to be unblocked. Looking through his block log, he seems to have been given far too many chances to redeem himself, but could never keep the promise and only carelessly continued his disruption. He's even blocked himself quite a bit before, acknowledging that what he did was wrong but failing to learn from his mistakes. RedBomb1(M•C•E)
Extremely Strong Oppose - Per above. Good edits is not an excuse to misbehave. If we allow this behavior to continue, others might think that being a good editor gives them a free pass to rule break. Jensonk clearly does not care about his behavior. He doesn't ever take his warnings seriously and acts the same after each termination/block. In addition, he was demoted from admin, then assistant, previous for the same reason. This has gone on for too long. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 19:24, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - Per my reasons in the block log really. It has to be said, I don't understand how many chances certain users think I should give him. He's been global blocked recently, and essentially has wished death on two users. He persistently ignores warnings and even left me a nice passive-aggressive response here. Per AMK, maybe we can discuss this again in a year but I've seen no evidence he will learn from his mistakes. --Spongebob456talk 19:29, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - How do we know what you're saying is true? You've spread false accusations surrounding me berore. SpongeBot678(M•C•E) 19:48, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I think it's not time to bring this here again. Thanks! ;) Nickmick(M•C•E•B)
Extremely Strong Oppose - Changed my mind. I think I really prefer people who do false edits, but STILL talk kindly and understand the situation (like Tumblrdesxx), to people who good phenomenal edits, but talk aggresively without understanding even with a hint, about what's going on, in way that they even insult others. And if Jensonk really cared for us, he would not continue being aggresive, or at least he would hide that fact, even if it is how Jensonk has been tending to talk in general. Nickmick(M•C•E•B)
Oppose - I could've supported, but he literally spammed my YouTube video comment sections to demand me to do stuff for him. In fact, I have a video proving that it's him. Link. Qwertyxp2000 II (talk | contribs) 23:08, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - If you possibly think you are the only one with this incident, you obviously haven't seen message walls of users, where Jensonk would tell 'em to do stuff he could easily do. Nickmick(M•C•E•B)
I wouldn't mind his telling on my wall, but I do mind if it's on my YouTube channel. Qwertyxp2000 II (talk | contribs) 02:13, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - The fact that this still went on, several demotions, and many blockings. All I gotta say is I oppose, since Jensonk has shown he hasn't learned anything. It doesn't mean he won't change, but it is true that as of now, as a user who has seen his behaviour since the beginning. I firmly oppose his block being changed and it is justified from how long it went. --Tominator777 (talk) 23:15, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Extremely Strong Oppose - Per RedBomb Tyler730(M•C•E) 20:13, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Extremely Strong Oppose - Per RedBomb and Alex FigmeisterMCE 01:24, November 6, 2017 (UTC)
OpPoSe -Per above. It's not acceptable behavior and Jensonk has had his fair chances to prove himself right. He's a good editor, but there's just too much stipulation and evidence against this notion. TanHamMan30px 01:25,11/10/2017
Oppose - He honestly doesn't seem to learn from his past mistakes, that or he doesn't really care. He has been blocked numerous times already and given plenty of second chances. In my opinion, an infinite block is just fine due to past behavior/blockings. Maybe in a year it can be discussed again as other users have suggested, but for now it's perfectly fine. TheKorraFanatic(Message Wall)(Contributions)(Guestbook)
Oppose - Look at his block history. He has not changed after them. Also, he trolled the chatbot. Marioman00|Edits 23:35, November 13, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Actually he has trolled, in this thread he trolled the Chatbot while ignoring a warning. So you might want to remove that in your reason for review. I agree with the above that he is very passive-aggressive.--Cheesie was here. 19:36, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Seriously? Jensonk was blocked permanently? Why? OnMyEssay1353 (talk) 22:42, November 5, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - For a persistent pattern of rude comments and refusing to reply to warnings. RedBomb1 (talk) 02:14, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - He sent EXTREMELY rude messages and attacks on community central directed towards me using an anonymous IP address. This is absolutely unacceptable in all cases! (Contact • Contrib) 13:53, November 10, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - To me, personally attacking me with curse words and bad language is absolutely unacceptable regardless of wiki. This is on community central, the main wiki of Fandom and this was based on an ESB issue! (Contact • Contrib) 03:21, November 12, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Still, behavior on other wikis doesn't matter here, even if it's community central. Expert at Terraria
Comment - I disagree. This is based on his personality and Golfpecks not being willing to trust him again is completely justified. Behavior in general matters a lot, even if it is on other wikis. If anyone thinks it is acceptable to send unacceptable messages anywhere, they clearly need to be looked at. In fact, behavior on other wikis can matter a lot in some circumstances. If a user breaks the ToU, they will be blocked wiki wide, and that matters a lot here, since it is also part of wiki. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 23:56, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - To be honest, while I still oppose, I sort of agree with Kitty that infinite might have been too long a legnth. If the admins are willing enough, I'd say that his ban should be decreased to at least a year. RedBomb1(M•C•E) 06:13, November 10, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I'd rather wait for another full year before we review his block again. Qwertyxp2000 II (talk | contribs) 09:32, November 10, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Shouldn’t we close this already? Tyler730(M•C•E) 2:11 PM, November 21, 2017 (UTC)