ESB:Block reviews/BrickBot

Block review The following is an ongoing block review. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules. You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion. {{Support}} - use this if you support the removal of the block. {{Neutral}} - use this if you are neutral to the removal of the block. {{Oppose}} - use this if you oppose the removal of the block. Note that neutrals do not affect the final percentage.

BrickBot (wall • contribs • 6)

Information	Details
Blocking administrator	Squiddleward.
Length of block	Infinite.
Reason for block	Non-admin bot account.
User starting review	TheKorraFanatic
Reason for review	In August, TheOneFootTallBrickWall's bot account, BrickBot, was infinitely blocked for being a non-bot administrator account. While this was a fair block, I believe that the account should be unblocked due to Brick disabling his main account in November with the intent of leaving FANDOM; however, Brick has returned to FANDOM (mainly CCC and a few other wikis) using his bot account as his main account. While he's not as active on FANDOM as he used to be, he does make the occasional visit now and then. Due to the account no longer being flagged as a bot, I think the previous reason is now invalid and with Brick's old account no longer being accessible, I see no reason as to why this account should be blocked anymore.

Support

• Support - True. --H𝕒𝕣𝕥 N𝕖𝕨 B𝕠𝕓 02:00, March 8, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - ѕqυι∂∂ℓєωαя∂ ^{❮мεssαgε ωαℓℓ ● cσηтяιвυтισηs ● ε∂ιтcσυηт❯ 02:05, March 8, 2018 (UTC)}
• Support - Roller (talk)
• Support - (Contact • Contrib) 02:15, March 8, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - (っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ Madiyunu - Message Wall ♥
• Support -  Spongebobvstheloudhouse ^(M•C•E)   05:41, April 19, 2024 (UTC)  
• Support - Is SpongeBot678 an unauthorized bot? Just because someone has bot in their username doesn't mean it's a bot. Even if BrickBot was a bot when Brick's main account was created, Brick's main is user choice disabled, so his alt accounts become his main account. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 02:00, March 9, 2018 (UTC)

Neutral

• Neutral - I don’t know which is true.  Tyler730 ^(M•C•E)  15:06, March 8, 2018 (UTC) 
• Neutral - •кσσℓкιттү <мεssαgε ωαℓℓ> (=^ ◡ ^=)• 17:31, March 8, 2018 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose - Brick has shown absolute disregard and held grudges against several users. On several occasions, he has dragged drama from outside of the wiki into the wiki in attempts to get that user in trouble. I believe he shouldn’t be unblocked because of this.  DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E)  13:47, March 8, 2018 (UTC) 
  • Comment - Brick wasn't blocked for any of that though..This is a block review for his bot that was blocked for being an unauthorized bot. TheKorraFanatic ^{(Talk Page) (Contributions) (Guestbook)}
• Oppose - Per Dan. Sorry to Brick, but his Reputation Wiki he made in October was very attention-seeking and caused way too much drama. While I feel bad for what he's gone through, nobody needs to make a whole wiki to tell people what they think of others. In fact, ICANHASCOOKIE has done this before, although his wikis were deleted. He also put this beforehand saying we should wait until "October 18, 2017" before telling us about that wiki. If AustinD-3 got blocked permanently for trolling when he made that blog, why should Brick go Scot-free? Ɔ • W • blɿoWɘʜTxoЯɘƨɘɘʜƆ 20:13, March 8, 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose - Philly makes some great points. Plus its just that if you have a name with bot it should be a bot on this wiki otherwise its trolling.  Jodan111 ^{(T•B•C•E)}  01:35, March 8, 2018 (UTC)

• Comment - so SpongeBot678, an administrator on this wiki who has a disclaimer on his userpage clearly stating he isn't a bot, is trolling? ѕqυι∂∂ℓєωαя∂ ^{❮мεssαgε ωαℓℓ ● cσηтяιвυтισηs ● ε∂ιтcσυηт❯ 01:42, March 9, 2018 (UTC)}

• I'm just saying that anybody with the name bot with their regular usernames for example Jodan111Bot. You may not call that as trolling but its still against the rules.  Jodan111 ^{(T•B•C•E)}  05:14, March 8, 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose - Per Philly, just not worth the risk.  Rocky Lobster ^(M•C•E)

Comments

• Comment - Speaking of blogs, I recall that no one cared when TrevorOntario719 did one of those. If people were okay with him doing so, why can't Brick do so? To those who will likely say "just because one person did it doesn't mean it's okay for others to do it," I completely agree. Which is why it's okay that Brick did it because it doesn't seem to be against the rules (or Trevor and Brick would have been warned and had their blogs removed). Even if it is against the rules, maybe Brick didn't think it was because Trevor did it and he wasn't punished at all. The most expensive boss, Alex.sapre (talk) 02:00, March 9, 2018 (UTC)